Supremacist Narratives and the Rhetoric of Power in President Donald Trump’s Second Inaugural Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2026.60.01Keywords:
Power rhetoric, Supremacist narratives, Donald Trump, Second inaugural speech, Critical discourse analysisAbstract
This study analyses President Donald Trump’s second inaugural speech delivered on January 20, 2025, to unearth the latent and manifest rhetorical tropes that amplify his supremacist narratives and power rhetoric. Anchored in the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework, the researchers analysed how Trump’s narrative and language in the speech construct, sustain, and legitimise power relations, supremacy, and hegemonic dominance. The data were extracted from the official transcript and video of the speech, and analysed using CDA’s textual, discursive, and socio-political dimensions. Results reveal Trump’s employment of Aristotelian logos, ethos, and pathos to evoke logic, credibility, and emotion, thereby reinforcing his supremacist, power-driven, populist, and nativist/nationalist persona. Messiah complex and solipsism, American nativism, Christian nationalism, power binarism, cultural exclusivism, and supremacist expansionism were the six thematic strands of supremacist narratives and power rhetoric identified in the speech. In a collective sense, these thematic strands embedded in Trump’s speech position him as a divinely appointed restorer of America’s greatness while maligning opponents and marginal groups/institutions. The study argues that Trump’s non-conventional rhetoric consolidates his ideological support base, valorises conservatism against progressivism, and redefines conventional U.S. presidential speech through confrontation, radicalism, and diminished political correctness. Ultimately, the study highlights how discursive strategies employed in Trump’s speech demonstrate the role of language and narrative as instruments of supremacy, dominance, power relations, and socio-political polarisation in contemporary democratic milieux/contexts.
______________________
Este estudio analiza el segundo discurso de la toma de posesión del presidente Donald Trump, pronunciado el 20 de enero de 2025, con el objetivo de identificar los recursos retóricos latentes y manifiestos que amplifican sus narrativas supremacistas y su retórica del poder. Basándose en el marco del Análisis Crítico del Discurso (ACD), los investigadores analizaron cómo la narrativa y el lenguaje de Trump en el discurso construyen, sostienen y legitiman las relaciones de poder, la supremacía y el dominio hegemónico. Los datos se extrajeron de la transcripción oficial y del vídeo del discurso, y se analizaron utilizando las dimensiones textuales, discursivas y sociopolíticas del ACD. Los resultados revelan el uso que hace Trump del logos, el ethos y el pathos aristotélicos para evocar la lógica, la credibilidad y la emoción, reforzando así su imagen supremacista, centrada en el poder, populista y nativista/nacionalista. El complejo mesiánico y el solipsismo, el nativismo estadounidense, el nacionalismo cristiano, la dicotomía del poder, el exclusivismo cultural y el expansionismo supremacista fueron las seis líneas temáticas de las narrativas supremacistas y la retórica del poder identificadas en el discurso. En conjunto, estas líneas temáticas, integradas en el discurso de Trump, lo posicionan como un restaurador de la grandeza estadounidense designado por la divinidad, al tiempo que difaman a sus oponentes y a los grupos e instituciones marginados. El estudio sostiene que la retórica poco convencional de Trump consolida su base de apoyo ideológico, promueve el conservadurismo frente al progresismo y redefine el discurso presidencial estadounidense convencional a través de la confrontación, el radicalismo y una reducción de la corrección política.
En última instancia, el estudio destaca cómo las estrategias discursivas empleadas en el discurso de Trump demuestran el papel del lenguaje y la narrativa como instrumentos de supremacía, dominación, relaciones de poder y polarización sociopolítica en entornos y contextos democráticos contemporáneos.
Downloads
References
Abbas, Ali H. (2019). Super-hyperbolic man: Hyperbole as an ideological discourse strategy in Trump’s speeches. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 32(2), 505-522.
Akinwotu, Samuel A. (2018). Language and style in political inaugurals: A study of inaugural speeches of Governor Olusegun Mimiko of Ondo State, Nigeria. British Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 1-15.
Akram, Wasim; Imran, Said, and Ul Hassan, Syed S. (2025). Tweets, hashtags, and campaigns: A multimodal analysis of Donald Trump’s social media strategy. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, (2), 1729-1748.
Al-Khawaldeh, Nisreen N.; Rababah, Luqman M.; Khawaldeh, Ali F., and Banikalef, Alaeddin A. (2023). The art of rhetoric: Persuasive strategies in Biden’s inauguration speech. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(936), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02450-y.
Alo, Moses A. (2012). A rhetorical analysis of selected political speeches of prominent African leaders. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 10(1), 87-100.
Ayaawan, Alimsiwen E. and Opoku, Gabriel (2020). Ideological discursive formations in an emerging democracy: The case of the presidential inaugural of Ghana in the Fourth Republic. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 9(1), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v9i1.306.
Banu, Sultana; Sharma, Balkrishna, and Pokharel, Bishnu P. (2025). Bluntness in popular culture: The Trump era’s ascent. BMC Research Journal, 4(1), 28-39.
Bhatia, Aditi and Ross, Andrew S. (2019). Trumpian tweets and populist politics: A corpus-assisted discourse analytical study. Politics and populism across modes and media. Peter Lang.
Biria, Reza and Mohammadi, Azadeh (2012). The socio-pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1290-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.
2012.05.013.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. (2020). Political rhetoric. In Thomas B. Farrell (Ed.), Landmark essays on contemporary rhetoric (pp. 1-22). Routledge.
Blackledge, Adrian (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. John Benjamin B.V.
Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447-466.
Boczkowski, Pablo J. and Papacharissi, Zizi (Eds.) (2018). Trump and the media. MIT Press.
Bonikowski, Bart (2019). Trump’s populism. In Kurt Weyland and Raúl L Madrid (Eds.), When democracy trumps populism
(pp. 110-131). Cambridge University Press.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2005). Persuasion, legitimacy and leadership. In Jonathan Charteris-Black (Ed.), Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (pp. 1-31). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Clark, Kenneth B. (1971). The pathos of power: A psychological perspective. American Psychologist, 26(12), 1047-1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032217.
Clayton, Edward W. (2004). The audience for Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Rhetorica, 22(2), 183-203.
Consigny, Scott (1974). Rhetoric and its situations. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 7(3), 175-186.
Danisch, Robert (2016). Rhetorical agency in a neoliberal age: Foucault, power, agency, and ethos. In Kim H. Nguyen (Ed.), Rhetoric in neoliberalism (pp. 63-85). Springer International Publishing.
David, Maya K. (2014). Language, power and manipulation: The use of rhetoric in maintaining political influence. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 5(1), 164-170.
Deetz, Stanley and Mumby, Dennis K. (2012). Power, discourse, and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition. In James Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 13 (pp. 18-47). Routledge.
Demaske, Chris (2022). Trump’s hateful rhetoric and First Amendment failures: Re-envisioning incitement, true threats, and hate speech. Communication and Democracy, 56(2), 91-116.
Dijk, Teun A. van (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
Dijk, Teun A. van (2012). Structures of discourse and structures of power. In James A. Anderson (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 12 (pp. 18-59). Routledge.
Dijk, Teun A. van (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485).
Emeka-Nwobia, Ngozi U. (2015). Religion in Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo’s political discourses. An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies, 4(1), 22-33.
Emrich, Cynthia G.; Brower, Holly H.; Feldman, Jack M., and Garland, Howard (2001). Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 527-557.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 739-763.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, Norman L. (2013). Language and power (2nd Edition). Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman L. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In John Flowerdew and John Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13-25). Routledge.
Fareh, Shehdeh; Malkawi, Rima J.; Rabab’ah, Ghaleb, and Alghazo, Sharif (2025). Framing crisis discourse in Biden’s political speech: The use of persuasion to rally public support. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 1-25.
Farfán, José Antonio Flores and Holzscheiter, Anna (2011). The power of discourse and the discourse of power. The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 139-152).
Finkelstein Jr, Leo (1981). The calendrical rite of the ascension to power. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318109374028.
Finlayson, Alan (2013). Ideology and political rhetoric. In Michael Freeden, Lyman Tower Sargent and Marc Stears (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political ideologies (pp. 197-213). Oxford University Press.
Fontana, Benedetto (2017). Bia and logos: Power and rhetoric in antiquity. History of Political Thought, 38(1), 25-43.
Gaufman, Elizaveta and Ganesh, Bharath (2024). Trump’s digital carnival: Media and multidirectional discourse. In Elizaveta Gaufman and Bharath Ganesh (Eds.), The Trump carnival: Populism, transgression and the far right (pp. 33-50). De Gruyter.
Giroux, Henry A. (2019). Trump and the legacy of a menacing past. Cultural Studies, 33(4), 711-739.
Gleasure, Rob; Conboy, Kieran, and Morgan, Lorraine (2019). Talking up a storm: How backers use public discourse to exert control in crowdfunded systems development projects. Information Systems Research, 30(2), 447-465.
Grant Davie, Keith (1997). Rhetorical situations and their constituents. Rhetoric Review, 15(2), 264-279.
Griebie, Anne M. (2021). The influence of personality on presidential leadership style (with a case study of Donald J. Trump, 45th president of the United States). (Undergraduate research, College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University).
Guo, Lei; Rohde, Jacob A., and Wu, Denis (2020). Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 US election networks. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 234-251.
Henderson, Robyn (2005). A Faircloughian approach to CDA: Principled eclecticism or a method searching for a theory? Critical Studies in Education, 46(2), 9-24.
Hmouma, Mohamed (2025). Analyzing Trump’s 2025 inaugural address using Fairclough’s Critical discourse analysis model. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(1), 4630-4636.
Homolar, Alexandra and Löfflmann, Georg (2023). Populist humiliation narratives and the mobilization of resistance. In Corina Lacatus, Gustav Meibauer, and Georg Löfflmann (Eds.), Political communication and performative leadership: Populism in international politics (pp. 317-333). Springer International Publishing.
Homolar, Alexandra and Scholz, Ronny (2019). The power of Trump-speak: Populist crisis narratives and ontological security. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(3), 344-364.
Howarth, David (2000). Discourse. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Hyde, Michael J. (Ed.) (2004). The ethos of rhetoric. University of South Carolina Press.
Ijsseling, Samuel (1976). Isocrates and the power of logos. In Samuel Ijsseling (Ed.), Rhetoric and philosophy in conflict: An historical survey (pp. 18-25). Springer Netherlands.
Irimiea, Silvia B. (2017). Professional discourse as social practice. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(4), 108-119.
Janks, Hilary (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329-342, DOI: 10.1080/0159630970180302.
Johnson, Tana and Foster, Margaret J. (2024). Rhetorical frames: A strategy of governmental power in international negotiations. Third World Quarterly, 45(12), 1832-1855.
Jorayeva, Barno N. (2021). Rhetoric in mass media. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 2(10), 703-706.
Kellner, Douglas (2016). American nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism (Vol. 117). Springer.
Kennedy, Rodney W. (2021). The immaculate mistake: How evangelicals gave birth to Donald Trump. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Khan, Ayesha (2024). The language of power: Discourse analysis and the politics of representation. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 2(1), 22-31.
Krall, Nora M. (2022). The ethos of Donald Trump: Trump’s lack of presidential decorum from 2016 forward and its impact on American politics (master’s thesis, The University of Alabama at Birmingham).
Krasner, Michael A. (2023). Tweets, taunts, tirades, and tantrums: How America’s Donald Trump transformed transgressive language into political power. In Ofer Feldman (Ed.), Debasing political rhetoric: Dissing opponents, journalists, and minorities in populist leadership communication (pp. 201-218). Springer Nature Singapore.
Krebs, Ronald R. and Jackson, Patrick T. (2007). Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35-66.
Kristoff, Brette (2023). Contextualizing Trumpism: Understanding race, gender, religiosity, and resistance in post-truth society (doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan).
Krzyżanowski, Michał (2011). Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: Towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 231-238.
Kuypers, Jim A. (2010). Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In Paul D’Angelo and Jim A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 302-327). Routledge.
Kyllesdal, Mari A. (2012). The power of repetition (doctoral dissertation, The University of Oslo).
Lacatus, Corina and Meibauer, Gustav (2023). Crisis, rhetoric and right-wing populist incumbency: An analysis of Donald Trump’s tweets and press briefings. Government and Opposition, 58(2), 249-267.
Lee Teten, Ryan (2007). “We the people”: The “modern” rhetorical popular address of the presidents during the founding period. Political Research Quarterly, 60(4), 669-682.
Lemke, Jay L. (2005). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
Linkevičiūtė, Vilma (2019). Conceptual metaphors in Donald Trump’s political discourse: politics domain (2018). Kalbų Studijos, 34, 46-55.
Lirola, María Martínez (2017). The relation of meaning to wording in Mandela’s speech of inauguration as President: A systemic functional analysis of rhetorical devices, marked syntax and appraisal. Journal of Modern Languages, 22(1), 19-31.
Loveday, Leo (1983). Rhetoric patterns in conflict: The sociocultural relativity of discourse-organizing processes. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(2), 169-190.
Lucas, Stephen E. (1986). Genre criticism and historical context: The case of George Washington’s first inaugural address. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51(4), 354-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948609372672.
Mailloux, Steven (1989). Rhetorical power. Cornell University Press.
Mattern, Janice B. (2005). Whysoft power’isn’t so soft: representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium, 33(3), 583-612.
Mayr, Andrea (2008). Introduction: Power, discourse and institutions. Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse, 34, 1-25.
Mensah, Eric O., Sikanku, Godwin E., Adae, Eric K., and Osei-Fordjour, Nana K. (2023). Political communication in an emerging democracy: A framing analysis of President Akufo-Addo’s 2021 inaugural address. Journal of Communications, Media and Society (JOCMAS), 9(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.63772/jocmas.v9n1.3.
Merkouraki, Maria and Tzioti, Konstantina (2024). Mapping the Trump-Harris first presidential debate: Narratives of Trumpism propagation rattle voters’ ontological security. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 7(4), 31-39.
Milford, Mike (2016). National Identity, Crisis, and the Inaugural Genre: George W. Bush and 9/11. Southern Communication Journal, 81(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2015.1064989.
Mumby, Dennis K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse (pp. 237-258).
Mumby, Dennis K. and Stohl, Cynthia (1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society, 2(3), 313-332.
Nacos, Brigitte L., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli (2020). Donald Trump. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(5), 2-25.
Nartey, Mark (2019). ‘I shall prosecute a ruthless war on these monsters…’: A critical metaphor analysis of discourse of resistance in the rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(2), 113-130.
Obong, Ubong A. (2023). Film in health campaigns and reduction in incidence of COVID-19 in Nigeria: A thematic discourse analysis. Tripodos, 54, 1-23.
Obong, Ubong A.; Ukpabio, Eme I., and Etifit, Samuel A. (2023). Film, propaganda, and the “new Nigeria” national philosophy: Deconstructing the latent socio-political themes in Bright Obasi’s film “If I am President”. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(2), 61-82.
Olsson, Gunnar (1991). Lines of power-limits of language. University of Minnesota Press.
Ouessal, Karbeche and Asya, Tarfa A. (2023). Negative rhetoric in Donald Trump’s political discourse and its implications (master’s dissertation, University 8 May/Guelma, Algeria).
Oyewole, Julius A. and Olufemi, Abiola (2023). Exploring power dynamics in political discourse: A discourse analysis of political speeches. Education and School Review, 18, 177-192.
Pinto, Jose (2018). Trump, a nationalist and a populist leader. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 18(1), 1-7.
Polak, Sara A. (2024). Donald Trump and truth social: Media platforms making exclusionary worlds. In G. Olson and M. Kreitler (Eds.), Diversity issues in the USA (pp. 137-147). Verlag. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4175588.
Rothman, Steven B. (2011). Revising the soft power concept: What are the means and mechanisms of soft power? Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 49-64.
Rutledge, Lloyd; Bailey, Brian; Ossenbruggen, Jacco van; Hardman, Lynda, and Geurts, Joost (2000, May). Generating presentation constraints from rhetorical structure. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM on hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 19-28).
Salek, Thomas A. and Cole, Andrew W. (2019). Donald Trump tweets the 2014 Ebola outbreak: The infectious nature of apocalyptic counterpublic rhetoric and constitution of an exaggerated health crisis. Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 21-40.
Shojaei, Amir; Youssefi, Kazem, and Hosseini, Hossein S. (2013). A CDA approach to the biased interpretation and representation of ideologically conflicting ideas in Western printed media. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 858-868.
Sigelman, Lee (1996). Presidential inaugurals: The modernization of a genre. Political Communication, 13(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963096.
Sillince, John A. (2000). Rhetorical power, accountability and conflict in committees: An argumentation approach. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1125-1156.
Simons, Herbert W. (1999). Requirements, problems, and strategies: A theory of persuasion for social movement. In John L. Lucaites, Celeste M. Condit, and Sally Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 385-395). Guilford Press.
Smith, Stephanie H.; Whitehead, George I.; Blackard, Matthew F., and Blackard, Michael F. (2015). First and second inaugural addresses of modern and traditional U.S. presidents: An analysis of self-presentational strategies. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(5), 28-33.
Somek, Alexander and Wilkinson, Michael A. (2020). Unpopular sovereignty? Modern Law Review, 83(5), 955-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12534.
Sullivan, Robert (2023). Kairos in Isocrates. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 56(3-4), 303-319.
Svehla, Lance and Lyons, William (2024). The audacity of Trump: The rhetorical strategy of president Donald Trump. In Michael Grossman, Francis Schortgen, Ronald Eric Matthews Jr., and David B. Cohen (Eds.), The legacy of the Trump Administration: A disruptive presidency (pp. 149-165). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Švobaitė, Jurga (2018). Rhetorical strategies in Donald Trump’s and Dalia Grybauskait’s political speeches. Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences. MA Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/115754 .
Taylor, Gary (2001). Power, pathos, character. In Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer (Eds.), Harold Bloom’s Shakespeare (pp. 43-63). Palgrave Macmillan US.
Tenorio, Encarnacion H. (2011). Critical discourse analysis: An overview. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 183-210.
The US Department of States (2025, January). President Trump’s Inaugural Address. https://www.state.gov//president-trump’s-inaugural-address.
The White House (2025, January). The Inaugural Address. https://www.whitehouse.gov//remarks/2025/01/the-inaugural-address.
Ulkhasanah, Witra (2021). Power representing ideology in Donald Trump’s political speech (doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).
Venizelos, Giorgos (2023). Donald Trump in power: Discourse, performativity, identification. Critical Sociology, 49(4-5), 647-667.
Vigil, Tammy R. (2013). George W. Bush’s first three inaugural addresses: Testing the utility of the inaugural genre. Southern Communication Journal, 78(5), 427-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2013.847479.
Weyland, Kurt and Madrid, Raúl L. (Eds.) (2019). When democracy trumps populism. Cambridge University Press.
Whineray, David (2020). The United States’ current and future relationship with the United Nations. United Nations University.
Widhiastuti, Hardani (2012). The effectiveness of communications in hierarchical organizational structure. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 185-190.
Wilentz, Sean (Ed.) (1999). Rites of power: Symbolism, ritual, and politics since the Middle Ages. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wilhoit, Debra H. (1994). Kairos revisited: The rhetorical situation and the art of becoming a rhetor (master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville).
Wodak, Ruth (1990). Discourse analysis: Problems, findings, perspectives. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(1-2), 125-132.
Xu, Ruike and Rees, Wyn (2021). America and the special relationship: The impact of the Trump administration on relations with the UK. British Politics, 17(1), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00198-0.
Zakharova, Oksana (2020). US President’s Inauguration Ceremonial as a Factor in Intercultural Communication. Reality of Politics: Estimates–Comments–Forecasts, 12, 114-124.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tripodos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Once an article has been approved for publication in Tripodos, the exclusive right to publish the work becomes the property of Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations of Ramon Llull University. These rights can be granted to a third party with the agreement of the author(s).
Until the articles have been approved for publication, Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations of Ramon Llull University has no rights over them.
The submission of articles is understood to represent explicit consent to these conditions of publication.
